CertPrepNowFREE
CompTIACY0-001184 concepts

CY0-001 Cheat Sheet

Quick reference for the CompTIA SecAI+ exam.

AI Types & Foundations

Generative AI
AI that creates new content (text, images, code, audio) based on learned patterns from training data. Examples: ChatGPT, DALL-E, Midjourney.
Machine Learning (ML)
Subset of AI where systems learn patterns from data without being explicitly programmed. Includes supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning.
Statistical Learning
Mathematical framework for understanding data relationships through statistical methods. Foundation for many ML algorithms (regression, classification).
Transformers
Neural network architecture using self-attention mechanisms. Foundation for modern LLMs. Processes entire input sequences in parallel rather than sequentially.
Deep Learning
ML using multi-layered neural networks to learn hierarchical representations. Excels at image recognition, NLP, and complex pattern detection.
Natural Language Processing (NLP)
AI techniques for understanding, interpreting, and generating human language. Includes sentiment analysis, translation, summarization, and entity extraction.
Large Language Models (LLMs)
Large-scale transformer models trained on massive text corpora. Capable of text generation, reasoning, and tool use. Examples: GPT-4, Claude, Llama.
Small Language Models (SLMs)
Compact language models optimized for specific tasks or resource-constrained environments. Lower latency and cost than LLMs. Examples: Phi, Gemma.
Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs)
Two neural networks (generator and discriminator) compete against each other. Generator creates content, discriminator evaluates authenticity. Used for deepfakes, image synthesis.

Training & Model Development

Supervised Learning
Model trains on labeled data (input-output pairs). Used for classification and regression. Requires ground-truth labels.
Unsupervised Learning
Model finds patterns in unlabeled data. Used for clustering, dimensionality reduction, and anomaly detection. No ground-truth labels needed.
Reinforcement Learning
Agent learns by interacting with an environment, receiving rewards or penalties. Used for game playing, robotics, and RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback).
Model Validation
Process of evaluating a trained model's performance using held-out test data. Ensures the model generalizes beyond training data and is not overfitting.
Fine-tuning
Adapting a pre-trained model to a specific task or domain by training on additional domain-specific data. More efficient than training from scratch.
Epoch
One complete pass through the entire training dataset. Multiple epochs allow the model to learn patterns progressively. Too many epochs can cause overfitting.
Pruning
Removing redundant or low-importance parameters (weights/neurons) from a model to reduce size and improve inference speed without significant accuracy loss.
Quantization
Reducing the precision of model weights (e.g., 32-bit to 8-bit) to decrease model size and speed up inference. Trades minor accuracy loss for efficiency.

Prompt Engineering & RAG

System Prompt
Hidden instructions that define the AI's role, behavior, and constraints. Set by developers, not visible to end users. Controls tone, safety, and output format.
User Prompt
The input provided by the end user to the AI model. Contains the question, task, or instruction the user wants the model to address.
Zero-shot Prompting
Asking the model to perform a task with no examples provided. Relies entirely on the model's pre-trained knowledge.
One-shot Prompting
Providing exactly one example before asking the model to perform a task. Helps the model understand the expected format and output style.
Multi-shot (Few-shot) Prompting
Providing multiple examples before asking the model to perform a task. More examples generally improve output quality and consistency.
System Roles
Predefined personas or behavioral guidelines assigned to the AI in the system prompt (e.g., 'You are a security analyst'). Shapes how the model responds.
Prompt Templates
Standardized, reusable prompt structures with placeholders for dynamic content. Enforce consistency and reduce prompt injection risk.
RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation)
Architecture that retrieves relevant documents from a knowledge base and provides them as context to the LLM before generation. Reduces hallucinations and provides up-to-date information.
Vector Storage
Specialized databases (vector DBs) that store and search high-dimensional embeddings. Enable semantic similarity search for RAG. Examples: Pinecone, Chroma, Weaviate.
Embeddings
Numerical vector representations of text, images, or other data. Similar concepts have similar vectors. Used for semantic search, clustering, and RAG retrieval.
Watermarking
Embedding hidden, detectable patterns in AI-generated content (text or images) to identify AI origin. Helps combat misinformation and track content provenance.

Data Security & Data Types

Data Cleansing
Removing errors, duplicates, inconsistencies, and noise from datasets before model training. Critical for model accuracy and preventing bias.
Data Verification
Confirming data accuracy and correctness against trusted sources. Ensures training data meets quality standards.
Data Lineage
Tracking data's origin, movement, and transformation through the pipeline. Documents where data came from and how it was modified over time.
Data Integrity
Ensuring data remains accurate, consistent, and unaltered throughout its lifecycle. Prevents tampering and corruption.
Data Provenance
Recording the complete history of data — origin, custody chain, and all transformations applied. More comprehensive than lineage.
Data Augmentation
Artificially increasing training dataset size by creating modified copies of existing data (rotation, cropping, paraphrasing). Reduces overfitting.
Data Balancing
Ensuring training data has proportional representation across categories. Prevents model bias toward overrepresented classes. Techniques: oversampling, undersampling, SMOTE.
Structured Data
Data organized in predefined schemas (rows/columns). Examples: SQL databases, spreadsheets, CSV files. Easy to query and analyze.
Semi-structured Data
Data with some organizational structure but no rigid schema. Examples: JSON, XML, email, log files. Has tags or markers for elements.
Unstructured Data
Data without predefined format or organization. Examples: images, audio, video, free-text documents. Requires AI/ML for analysis.

AI Lifecycle & Human Oversight

AI Lifecycle Stages
Business use case → Data collection → Data preparation → Model development → Model evaluation → Deployment → Validation → Monitoring → Feedback loop. Iterative process.
Business Use Case Definition
First lifecycle stage: identifying the problem AI will solve, expected outcomes, success criteria, and ROI justification.
Data Collection & Preparation
Gathering, cleaning, labeling, and transforming raw data into formats suitable for model training. Most time-consuming lifecycle phase.
Model Development & Evaluation
Selecting algorithms, training models, tuning hyperparameters, and evaluating performance against metrics (accuracy, precision, recall, F1).
Deployment & Monitoring
Putting models into production, monitoring performance, detecting drift, and collecting feedback for continuous improvement.
Human-in-the-Loop (HITL)
Requiring human review and approval at critical decision points in AI workflows. Essential for high-stakes decisions (medical, legal, financial).
Human Oversight
Continuous human supervision of AI systems to ensure they operate within defined boundaries and ethical guidelines. Mandated by regulations like the EU AI Act.
Human Validation
Human experts reviewing and verifying AI outputs for correctness, appropriateness, and safety before they are acted upon or published.

Threat Modeling Frameworks

OWASP LLM Top 10
Top 10 security risks for LLM applications: prompt injection, insecure output, training data poisoning, model DoS, supply chain, sensitive info disclosure, insecure plugin, excessive agency, overreliance, model theft.
OWASP ML Security Top 10
Top 10 risks for ML systems: input manipulation, data poisoning, model inversion, membership inference, model theft, AI supply chain, transfer learning attack, model skewing, output integrity, model DoS.
MITRE ATLAS
Adversarial Threat Landscape for AI Systems. Knowledge base of adversary tactics and techniques targeting AI/ML, modeled after MITRE ATT&CK. Maps real-world AI attacks.
MIT AI Risk Repository
Comprehensive database of AI-related risks cataloging threats across technical, ethical, and societal dimensions. Academic research resource for AI risk assessment.
CVE AI Working Group
Working group focused on standardizing vulnerability identification and reporting for AI/ML systems within the CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) framework.

AI Security Controls

Model Guardrails
Programmatic rules that constrain AI model inputs and outputs. Prevent harmful content generation, enforce topic boundaries, and block dangerous instructions.
Prompt Templates
Predefined prompt structures that limit user input to specific fields. Reduce prompt injection risk by controlling what reaches the model.
Prompt Firewalls
Security layer that inspects, filters, and blocks malicious prompts before they reach the AI model. Detects prompt injection, jailbreaking, and data exfiltration attempts.
Rate Limiting
Restricting the number of API requests per user/time period. Prevents model DoS, cost abuse, and automated attacks against AI endpoints.
Token Limits
Capping the maximum number of input/output tokens per request. Controls costs, prevents resource exhaustion, and limits data extraction.
Input Validation & Limits
Sanitizing and constraining user inputs — length, format, character sets, and content type. First line of defense against injection attacks.
Modality Limits
Restricting which input types (text, image, audio, file upload) a model can accept. Reduces attack surface by limiting input vectors.
Endpoint Access Controls
Authentication, authorization, and network-level restrictions on AI model API endpoints. Includes API keys, OAuth tokens, IP allowlists, and VPN requirements.

Access Controls for AI Systems

Model Access Controls
Restricting who can query, modify, retrain, or deploy AI models. Role-based permissions for model inference vs. model management operations.
Data Access Controls
Governing who can access training data, inference data, and model outputs. Includes classification-based access, need-to-know restrictions, and data compartmentalization.
Agent Access Controls
Limiting what actions AI agents can perform — which tools they can call, what systems they can access, and what operations they can execute autonomously.
Network/API Access Controls
Network segmentation, API gateway policies, and firewall rules governing communication between AI components, data stores, and external services.
Least Privilege for AI
Granting AI systems and agents only the minimum permissions needed for their function. Prevents excessive agency and limits blast radius of compromise.

Data Security for AI

Encryption in Transit
Encrypting data as it moves between components (TLS/HTTPS). Protects prompts, responses, and training data flowing between clients, APIs, and models.
Encryption at Rest
Encrypting stored data — model weights, training datasets, embeddings, and logs. Uses AES-256 or similar. Protects against unauthorized access to storage.
Encryption in Use
Processing data while it remains encrypted using techniques like homomorphic encryption, secure enclaves, or confidential computing. Protects data during inference.
Data Anonymization
Irreversibly removing personally identifiable information from datasets. Techniques: generalization, suppression, noise addition. Cannot be reversed.
Data Classification Labels
Tagging data with sensitivity levels (public, internal, confidential, restricted). Determines handling requirements and which models can access the data.
Data Redaction
Permanently removing sensitive content from data before it reaches the model. Applied to inputs (PII in prompts) and outputs (sensitive info in responses).
Data Masking
Replacing sensitive data with realistic but fake values (e.g., masking SSN as XXX-XX-1234). Preserves data format while protecting sensitive content.
Data Minimization
Collecting and retaining only the minimum data necessary for the AI task. Reduces exposure risk and aligns with privacy regulations (GDPR, EU AI Act).

Monitoring & Auditing AI Systems

Prompt Monitoring (Query)
Inspecting user inputs for prompt injection attempts, policy violations, sensitive data leakage, and abuse patterns. Logs queries for audit trails.
Prompt Monitoring (Response)
Inspecting model outputs for hallucinations, harmful content, data leakage, bias, and policy violations before delivering to users.
Log Monitoring
Collecting and analyzing AI system logs for anomalies, unauthorized access, unusual query patterns, and security incidents.
Log Sanitization
Removing sensitive data (PII, credentials, proprietary info) from logs before storage. Prevents log files from becoming a data leakage vector.
Log Protection
Securing log integrity through immutable storage, access controls, and tamper-evident mechanisms. Ensures logs are reliable for forensics and auditing.
Confidence Levels
Monitoring model confidence scores for predictions. Low confidence may indicate out-of-distribution inputs, adversarial manipulation, or model degradation.
Rate & Cost Monitoring
Tracking API usage rates, token consumption, and associated costs. Detects anomalies like abuse, data exfiltration, or runaway automated queries.
Hallucination Auditing
Systematically reviewing AI outputs for fabricated facts, false citations, or invented information. Critical for high-stakes applications.
Accuracy Auditing
Periodically evaluating model performance against ground-truth data to detect degradation, drift, or emerging failure modes.
Bias & Fairness Auditing
Evaluating model outputs across demographic groups for discriminatory patterns. Tests for disparate impact, representation bias, and equitable outcomes.
Access Auditing
Reviewing who accessed AI systems, what queries were made, what data was retrieved, and whether access was authorized. Supports compliance requirements.

AI Attacks — Prompt & Input Attacks

Prompt Injection
Crafting malicious input that overrides system prompts or instructions. Direct injection targets the user prompt; indirect injection hides instructions in retrieved data (e.g., web pages, documents).
Jailbreaking
Techniques to bypass model safety guardrails and content policies. Methods include role-playing scenarios, encoding tricks, hypothetical framing, and multi-turn manipulation.
Input Manipulation
Modifying inputs (adversarial examples) to cause misclassification or incorrect outputs. Subtle perturbations that are imperceptible to humans but fool the model.
Guardrail Circumvention
Bypassing safety controls through creative prompt engineering, encoding, multi-step attacks, or exploiting edge cases in guardrail logic.
Insecure Output Handling
Exploiting applications that trust AI output without validation. AI output containing code, SQL, or commands gets executed without sanitization, enabling XSS, SSRF, or RCE.

AI Attacks — Model & Data Attacks

Data Poisoning
Injecting malicious or manipulated data into training datasets. Causes the model to learn incorrect patterns, produce biased outputs, or create hidden backdoors.
Model Poisoning
Directly tampering with model weights, architecture, or training process. Can introduce trojans/backdoors that activate on specific trigger inputs.
Model Inversion
Reconstructing training data from model outputs. Attacker queries the model repeatedly to reverse-engineer sensitive data used during training.
Model Theft (Model Extraction)
Stealing a proprietary model by systematically querying it and using responses to train a clone/surrogate model. Violates IP and enables offline attacks.
Membership Inference
Determining whether a specific data record was used in the model's training data. Privacy violation — can reveal individuals' presence in sensitive datasets.
Model Skewing
Subtly manipulating model behavior over time through carefully crafted inputs during online/continuous learning. Gradually degrades model performance or introduces bias.
Transfer Learning Attacks
Exploiting vulnerabilities in pre-trained base models that persist through fine-tuning. Backdoors in foundation models propagate to all downstream models.
Supply Chain Attacks
Compromising AI components — pre-trained models, libraries, datasets, or dependencies — before they reach the target organization. Attacks the AI development pipeline.

AI Attacks — Operational & Output Attacks

Hallucinations
Model generates plausible-sounding but factually incorrect information. Can be exploited by attackers to spread misinformation or manipulated via poisoned RAG sources.
Bias Introduction
Deliberately introducing biased data or prompts to make AI produce discriminatory or skewed outputs. Can be subtle and difficult to detect.
Output Integrity Attacks
Manipulating or intercepting model outputs between generation and delivery. Man-in-the-middle attacks on AI responses or tampering with cached outputs.
Model DoS (Denial of Service)
Overwhelming AI model endpoints with requests or crafting inputs that consume excessive compute resources. Causes service degradation or outage.
Sensitive Information Disclosure
Extracting confidential data from AI models — training data, system prompts, API keys, or PII — through clever querying or prompt injection.
Insecure Plugin/Tool Use
Exploiting AI plugins or tool integrations that lack proper input validation, authentication, or authorization. Attacker uses AI as a proxy to attack connected systems.
Excessive Agency
AI systems granted too many permissions, capabilities, or autonomy. Model performs unintended actions through tools or APIs with overly broad access.
Overreliance
Users or organizations trusting AI outputs without verification. Leads to undetected errors, hallucinations being accepted as fact, and reduced human critical thinking.

Compensating Controls

Prompt Firewalls (Compensating)
Deploy prompt firewalls to detect and block prompt injection, jailbreaking, and data exfiltration. Acts as a WAF equivalent for AI applications.
Guardrails (Compensating)
Implement input/output guardrails to enforce content policies, block harmful content, and validate response safety when model-level controls are insufficient.
Access Controls (Compensating)
Apply RBAC, ABAC, and network segmentation to restrict who can interact with AI models, access training data, and manage deployments.
Data Integrity Controls
Hash verification, checksums, and digital signatures for training data, model weights, and pipeline artifacts. Detect tampering and poisoning.
Encryption (Compensating)
Apply encryption at all stages (transit, rest, in use) to protect prompts, responses, training data, and model weights from interception or theft.
Prompt Templates (Compensating)
Use structured prompt templates to constrain user input and reduce injection surface. Parameterize inputs rather than allowing free-form prompts.
Rate Limiting (Compensating)
Enforce request rate limits, token limits, and cost ceilings to prevent DoS, data exfiltration via high-volume queries, and cost abuse.
Least Privilege (Compensating)
Restrict AI agent permissions to minimum required capabilities. Limit tool access, API scope, and autonomous action authority to reduce excessive agency risk.

AI-Assisted Security Tools

IDE Plugins
AI-powered code completion and security scanning within development environments. Detect vulnerabilities as code is written (e.g., GitHub Copilot, Snyk).
Browser Plugins
AI extensions for threat analysis, phishing detection, and security research within web browsers.
CLI Plugins
Command-line AI tools for security operations — log analysis, threat hunting, incident triage, and automated scripting.
Chatbots & Personal Assistants
AI conversational interfaces for security operations — answering policy questions, triaging alerts, guiding incident response, and knowledge management.
MCP Server
Model Context Protocol server — standardized way to connect AI assistants to external tools and data sources. Enables AI agents to interact with security systems.

AI Security Use Cases

Signature Matching
AI-enhanced pattern matching to detect known malware signatures, attack patterns, and IoCs with higher accuracy and fewer false positives.
Code Linting & Security
AI-powered static analysis that identifies security vulnerabilities, code smells, and compliance violations in source code.
Vulnerability Analysis
AI-assisted identification, prioritization, and remediation of vulnerabilities. Contextualizes CVEs based on environment and exploitability.
Automated Penetration Testing
AI-driven offensive security testing that discovers attack paths, exploits vulnerabilities, and reports findings without manual intervention.
Anomaly Detection
ML models that learn normal behavior baselines and flag deviations — unusual network traffic, login patterns, or data access behavior.
Pattern Recognition
AI identifying recurring threat patterns, attack campaigns, and TTPs across large volumes of security data that overwhelm human analysts.
Incident Management
AI-assisted alert triage, incident classification, severity assessment, playbook recommendation, and automated response orchestration.
AI-Powered Threat Modeling
Automated identification of threats, attack surfaces, and risk scenarios for applications and infrastructure using AI analysis.
Fraud Detection
ML models identifying fraudulent transactions, account takeover, and financial anomalies in real-time. Combines behavioral analysis with pattern matching.

AI Attack Vectors & Adversarial AI

Deepfakes — Impersonation
AI-generated synthetic media (video, audio, images) mimicking real people for identity fraud, CEO fraud, vishing, and authentication bypass.
Deepfakes — Misinformation
AI-generated fake content (articles, images, video) that appears authentic. Spread unintentionally — distinguishes from deliberate disinformation.
Deepfakes — Disinformation
Deliberately created and distributed deepfake content designed to deceive, manipulate public opinion, or cause harm. Intentional deception at scale.
Adversarial Networks
Using AI (including GANs) to generate attack content — malware that evades detection, phishing emails that bypass filters, and adversarial examples.
AI-Powered Reconnaissance
Using AI to automate OSINT gathering, target profiling, infrastructure mapping, and vulnerability discovery at scale during the reconnaissance phase.
AI-Enhanced Social Engineering
AI-generated personalized phishing, vishing with cloned voices, and context-aware pretexting that is more convincing than traditional social engineering.
AI-Powered Obfuscation
Using AI to automatically obfuscate malware, evade detection signatures, and create polymorphic code that changes with each execution.

Automated Attacks & AI Automation

Attack Vector Discovery
AI automatically scanning and identifying exploitable vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and attack paths in target environments.
Automated Payload Generation
AI generating custom exploit payloads tailored to specific targets and vulnerabilities. Adapts payloads to bypass specific defenses.
AI-Generated Malware
Using AI to create novel malware variants, polymorphic code, and evasive techniques that bypass traditional signature-based detection.
AI Honeypots
AI-powered deception technology that creates realistic-looking fake systems, data, and services to detect, study, and delay attackers.
AI-Powered DDoS
Using AI to optimize DDoS attack patterns — adaptive rate adjustment, target selection, and evasion of DDoS mitigation systems.
Low-code/No-code Scripting
AI enabling non-technical users to create automation scripts and workflows through natural language. Security concern: lowers barrier for malicious automation.
Document Synthesis
AI generating reports, documentation, and analysis from multiple data sources. Used for incident reports, compliance documentation, and threat intelligence.
Incident Response Tickets
AI automatically creating, categorizing, and prioritizing incident response tickets from security alerts with relevant context and remediation steps.
Change Management
AI-assisted change request analysis, risk assessment, and approval routing. Evaluates potential security impact of proposed changes.
AI Agents
Autonomous AI systems that can plan, use tools, and execute multi-step tasks. In security: automated investigation, response orchestration, and threat hunting.

CI/CD for AI Security

Code Scanning (SAST)
AI-enhanced static application security testing in CI/CD pipelines. Identifies vulnerabilities in source code before deployment.
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
Scanning dependencies, libraries, and AI model components for known vulnerabilities. Critical for AI supply chain security.
Unit & Regression Testing
Automated tests validating AI model behavior, output quality, and safety properties. Regression tests catch unintended changes after updates.
Model Testing
Specialized testing for AI models — adversarial testing, bias testing, robustness evaluation, and safety boundary testing in the pipeline.
Automated Deployment/Rollback
CI/CD automation for model deployment with automatic rollback if performance metrics drop, safety checks fail, or anomalies are detected post-deployment.

AI Governance & Roles

AI Center of Excellence (CoE)
Centralized organizational body that establishes AI strategy, standards, best practices, and governance policies. Coordinates AI efforts across departments.
AI Policies & Procedures
Formal documents defining acceptable AI use, security requirements, data handling, model lifecycle management, and incident response for AI systems.
Data Scientist
Develops and trains ML models, performs statistical analysis, and creates data-driven solutions. Focus on model accuracy and performance.
AI Architect
Designs overall AI system architecture, selects technologies, and ensures scalability, security, and integration with existing infrastructure.
ML Engineer
Bridges data science and engineering — productionizes models, builds training pipelines, and optimizes model performance for deployment.
Platform Engineer
Builds and maintains the infrastructure and platforms that AI/ML teams use — compute clusters, GPU infrastructure, and development environments.
MLOps Engineer
Manages the operational lifecycle of ML models — CI/CD for models, monitoring, versioning, and automated retraining pipelines.
AI Security Architect
Designs security controls specifically for AI systems — threat modeling, secure architecture, and defense strategies against AI-specific attacks.
AI Governance Engineer
Implements governance frameworks, compliance controls, and policy enforcement mechanisms for AI systems across the organization.
AI Risk Analyst
Identifies, assesses, and quantifies risks associated with AI systems — technical risks, ethical risks, compliance risks, and business risks.
AI Auditor
Conducts independent assessments of AI systems for compliance, fairness, accuracy, and adherence to organizational policies and regulations.
Data Engineer
Builds and maintains data pipelines, data infrastructure, and data quality systems that feed AI/ML models with clean, reliable data.

Responsible AI Principles

Fairness
AI systems must treat all people equitably, avoid discrimination, and not create or reinforce unfair bias based on protected characteristics.
Reliability & Safety
AI systems must operate correctly under expected and unexpected conditions, with fail-safes and fallback mechanisms for critical applications.
Transparency
Organizations must be open about when and how AI is used, what data it processes, and how decisions are made. Users should know they are interacting with AI.
Privacy & Security
AI systems must protect personal data, comply with privacy regulations, and implement security controls throughout the AI lifecycle.
Explainability
AI decisions must be understandable and interpretable by humans. Users and stakeholders should be able to understand why a model made a specific decision.
Inclusiveness
AI systems must be designed to work for diverse populations, be accessible, and consider the needs of all user groups including those with disabilities.
Accountability
Clear ownership and responsibility for AI system outcomes. Organizations and individuals must be answerable for AI decisions and their consequences.
Consistency
AI systems should produce reliable, predictable, and reproducible results across similar inputs and use cases. Inconsistent outputs erode trust.

AI Risks & Compliance

Bias Risk
AI systems reflecting or amplifying biases in training data or design. Can lead to discrimination, legal liability, and reputational damage.
Data Leakage Risk
Sensitive training data, prompts, or outputs being exposed through model queries, logs, or inference. Includes memorization of PII by LLMs.
Reputational Loss
Brand damage from AI generating harmful, offensive, biased, or incorrect content. Amplified by social media and public scrutiny of AI failures.
Model Accuracy Risk
Models producing incorrect predictions or recommendations that lead to bad business decisions, financial losses, or safety incidents.
IP Risks
Intellectual property concerns — AI training on copyrighted data, generating infringing content, or exposing proprietary information through model outputs.
Autonomous Systems Risk
AI systems making decisions or taking actions without adequate human oversight. Higher risk in safety-critical domains (autonomous vehicles, medical, military).
Shadow AI
Unauthorized use of AI tools by employees without IT/security approval. Creates ungoverned data flows, compliance violations, and security blind spots.
EU AI Act
European regulation classifying AI systems by risk level (unacceptable, high, limited, minimal). Mandates conformity assessments, transparency, and human oversight for high-risk AI.
OECD AI Standards
International principles for trustworthy AI — transparency, accountability, robustness, and safety. Adopted by 40+ countries as a governance baseline.
ISO AI Standards
International standards for AI — ISO/IEC 42001 (AI management system), ISO/IEC 23894 (AI risk management), and others covering AI lifecycle governance.
NIST AI RMF
NIST AI Risk Management Framework — structured approach to managing AI risks across Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage functions. Voluntary US framework.

Corporate AI Governance

Sanctioned vs Unsanctioned Models
Sanctioned: AI models approved by the organization for use. Unsanctioned: unapproved models (Shadow AI). Organizations must maintain approved model inventories.
Private vs Public Models
Private: models deployed within organizational infrastructure with full data control. Public: third-party hosted models (e.g., ChatGPT API) with data leaving the organization.
Sensitive Data Governance
Policies controlling how sensitive data (PII, PHI, financial, classified) can be used in AI training, prompts, and outputs. Includes DLP controls for AI.
Third-party Evaluations
Independent assessments of AI vendors, models, and services for security, compliance, and risk. Includes red-teaming, bias testing, and security audits.
Data Sovereignty
Legal requirement that data is subject to the laws of the country where it is stored or processed. Critical for AI systems using cloud-based models across jurisdictions.

Ready to test yourself?

Start a timed CY0-001 mock exam or review practice questions by domain.